Desperate for blog material, I did what any other self-respecting blogger would do.
I procrastinated.
I flitted about in Yahoo, learning about home invaders busted on Facebook, what Lady Gaga looked like at age 9 (Don’t click. Really. A waste of time.), and a gutsy woman who chases a bear from her home.
I did a little online banking. The good news? Beginning tomorrow another credit card balance will be at zero! The bad news? Bank account balances are fast approaching zero.
I goofed around on my favorite Disney message board site and learned about crowd levels between Christmas and New Years (Horrendous), next must try snack at EPCOT (Norway’s School Bread), and yet another awesome cast member story (Click here for original post.)
And I checked my email.
I found this interesting note in my inbox.
“I work with blahblahblah and we recently published an article you might be interested in.”
The title of said “article” was interesting and feeling a little lazy today, I actually entertained re-posting it.
“After following your blog for awhile now, I felt this article would be something that would interest your readers. Here’s the link…”
Hmmm. Following my blog for awhile? I’m flattered.
“Either way, your blog has been a sincere pleasure to read. Thanks for your time!”
A sincere pleasure to read. Always good to hear.
So, I scan my followers list. Nope. No Miss C. Maybe she has me bookmarked another way.
So, I click the link to the article. Yes. It’s a bona fide article. And interesting, too.
But it is plastered on a website that is an advertisement for something completely irrelevant to my readers. In fact, every link, sidebar and highlighted clicky thingy is unrelated to the article that drew me there in the first place.
I have half a mind to republish the article, without a link back to their site, and capitalize on the free material.
But that’s against my principles.
And besides.
Look at that.
Without even realizing it, I just got a free post.
Ha!
Getting Your Blog Posts Via Facebook: The Ultimate Lazy Writing Move
One of the things that annoys me about television journalism is “man on the street” interviews about important subjects. First of all, I live near a big, metropolitan city in the south. Oh heck, I’ll just say it. I live near Atlanta. Watching the evening news is painful. When the Michael Vick story was big every stereotypical impoverished white person or black person was on the news giving their often inarticulate opinion. And then, because the station is based in Atlanta, their clip would make it on CNN.
So embarrassing.
I sometimes wonder if the producers are just having a little fun, spicing up their already boring day, by choosing the people with the heaviest southern accents, or poor grammar, or ridiculous comments regarding les news du jour.
And then, of course, there’s Fox News (not based in Atlanta, thank God) with their inane banter and shallow commentary on newsworthy events. I don’t want to hear from the man on the street. I certainly don’t want to hear the opinions of news journalist wannabes who got the job because they looked good on camera.
Just give me the news, for God’s sakes. Give me the facts and let me decide how I feel about it. I’m not a lemming. I don’t need to hear how Joe Blow feels before I can decide what I think about the situation in Iran.
So, I read most of my news. But even that can be tricky. I’ll be reading along and mid-way through I realize I’m reading opinion, thinly disguised as fact. By the end of the article, I’m both sure that it’s opinion and I’m disgusted. If the topic really interests me, I’ll Google it and sift through fact and fiction until I get a clear picture. But what a pain in the fingers.
Imagine my surprise when I find an article, online, promising The 13 Things That Blah, Blah, Blah (I’m not going to name it. It wasn’t that great of an article and I don’t want to hurt the blogger’s – dare I say writer’s? – feelings.)
The article gave a cursory overview of the topic in one or two paragraphs and then……
…wait for it……
…wait for it…..
Facebook fans wrote the rest.
Oh, sure. The writer (I use this term loosely) compiled the responses. But items #1, #2, #3 and so on were quotations via Facebook.
An entire article based on Joe and Jane Blows from Facebook. Their opinion. Not even a collective study of the most 13 Blah, Blah, Blahs. Just 13 random opinions that were gathered from a Facebook page.
Now that’s the ultimate lazy writing move.
And if I ever get a case of terminal writer’s block?
Hmmmmmm……..
She might be on to something.
Rate this:
8 Comments
Filed under Blogging, Observations
Tagged as CNN, commentary, facebook, fact vs. opinion, FOX News, journalism, journalist, man on the street interviews, news, writer's block